Spiderman 3
#51
Posted 05 April 2005 - 13:54
Chris Claremont, Scott Lobdell, Fabian Nicieza, Grant Morrison och Joss Whedon skriver X-Men BÄST!
"I caught a glimpse now it haunts me"
#52
Posted 05 April 2005 - 14:01
#53
Posted 05 April 2005 - 14:07
last.fm Filmtipset
#54
Posted 05 April 2005 - 17:51
#55
Posted 05 April 2005 - 17:53
Men Danny Elfman är ju ändå kompositören med stort "k" för såna här ändåmål, men visst finns det andra duktiga kompisöterer av filmmusik
![]()
Men hans musik till Spider-Man har liksom ändå inte varit så minnesvärd.
#56
Posted 05 April 2005 - 17:59
last.fm Filmtipset
#57
Posted 05 April 2005 - 18:29
Sen är Hulk en rätt dålig film IMHO, men har ändå väldigt bra musik.
#58
Posted 05 April 2005 - 19:26
Läste på superherohype att någon tjej ville ha rollen som en blond skurk som hon påstod skulle medverka i film nummer tre. Kan väl bara vara Black Cat?
Sam hade väl tänkt att ha med henne redan i tvåan tillsammans med Lizard om jag inte minns fel.
hoppas att det bara är ett taskigt rykte...
#59
Posted 05 April 2005 - 21:02
edit: Black Cat inte Catwoman.
Edited by zaphod, 23 May 2005 - 23:11.
#60
Posted 23 May 2005 - 23:25
Vad tror ni om Topher Grace i Spider-man 3? Känns som man inte alls vet hur man ska spekulera längre. Vem kan man tänka sig att han ska spela? Kanske Electro eller Scorpion. Det blir ju ingen biffskurk precis. Det utesluter väl Venom och Kraven.
Eller är det ens säkert att Topher ska spela skurk? Det är ändå troligast, för det finns ju ingen annan karaktär som man skulle kunna kasta in nu.
Men i så fall har man två skådisar som ska spela skurkar. Det tycker jag tyder på att vi inte får se Harry som Goblin. Tre skurkar vore bara löjligt.
#61
Posted 24 May 2005 - 21:06
Insändare ur Gefle Dagblad 17/10 2005.
"Tyvärr förvandlas han ideligen till en löjligt brinnande dödskalle"
Filmrecensenten Kristian Ekenberg om Nicholas Cage som Ghost Rider, ur Gefle Dagblad 17/3 2007
#62
Posted 24 May 2005 - 22:38
#63
Posted 25 May 2005 - 08:35
Jättebra ide faktiskt. Eller att spindeln hindrar ett bankrån med Shocker eller nåt liknande. Skulle vara kul med mer i filmerna som antyder att New York är fullt med superfigurer.Skulle faktiskt inte ha nåt emot om de hade en skurk i en liten cameo. Typ att filmen börjar med att Spider-Man just har spöat Rhino eller nåt liknande. Det kan ju vara ett sätt att använda karaktärer som inte blivit lika utforskade som andra.
Förövrigt hade jag hoppats att min favorit marvelkaraktär Vulture skulle medverka i filmen men det är nog inte särskilt troligt.
#64
Posted 25 July 2005 - 18:28
Varför funkar inte min spoilertag ???????
Ahh nu fixade jag det
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Chama-Chama-Chama Chameleon
Posted on Mon, 25-Jul-2005
They've been trying to keep it under wraps, but seems Development-Hell.com has managed to tug the tape off a "Spider-Man 3" secret : Who the villains are?
According to the site, Thomas Haden Church isn't playing Sandman, nor is he Venom, as previously rumoured. He'll actually be 'The Chameleon'.
Says an insider, "A source close to the production of Spider-Man 3 confirmed for me that the main villain played by Mr. Thomas Hayden Church will in fact be the Chameleon.
Church plays Dmitri Smerdyakov, who goes by false name Dr. Turner at Peter's college. The Chameleon also has a brother in this film, which will set up Kraven the Hunter for a future sequel I'm told."
Adds the scooper, "They will also start issuing a new animated DVD featuring the Chameleon right before the new movie hits theatres".
The other villain in the film will be the Second Green Goblin, played by James Franco, but he won't rear his head until the end of the film. No word on who Topher Grace is playing yet, but it's been reported that he'll be a bit wearing a villain's tag too.
Edited by Forever Xena, 25 July 2005 - 18:30.
Xena doesn't just have a warcry. She made war cry. Just ask Ares
For Xena, death is never permanent. Its just a slight set back and always part of her plan.
If you're going through hell, keep going.Winston Churchill
#65
Posted 25 July 2005 - 18:59
last.fm Filmtipset
#66
Posted 25 July 2005 - 19:51
Hoppas man får se lite av Spidde missförstådd/på flykt från rättvisan som är ett klassiskt tema i serien men inte riktigt utforskats i filmerna. Där är han väldigt populär bland folket.
Hoppas ryktet har rätt angående Harrys roll i filmen.
#67
Posted 25 July 2005 - 21:27
Hoppas ryktet har rätt angående Harrys roll i filmen.
Håller med till hundra procent, Kerm. En ny Green Goblin skulle va kul att se. Hoppas att Topher Grace spelar Ned Leeds, han passar lite grann som honom.
Chris Claremont, Scott Lobdell, Fabian Nicieza, Grant Morrison och Joss Whedon skriver X-Men BÄST!
"I caught a glimpse now it haunts me"
#68
Posted 26 July 2005 - 01:30
Intressant teori om Ned Leeds, kan nog mycket väl bli så.
#69
Posted 18 August 2005 - 12:10
About those SPIDER-MAN 3 villain rumors...
Hey guys, Quint here. We've been getting email after email demanding why we're not covering this huge revelation recently regarding SPIDER-MAN 3 and the villains old webhead will have to deal with. Well, there are a couple reasons...
Originally, about 4 weeks ago, the rumor was started saying the main villain in SPIDER-MAN 3 will be Chameleon (Thomas Hayden Church). We also received this letter from, I'm guessing, the same source (it was word for word the same as what was printed later that day by DV-H.com) as Development-Hell, who broke the story, but we didn't run it. We've reported our own rumors on SPIDER-MAN 3 and what our sources were telling us just doesn't jive with this information.
There are also other rumors that have been floating around since Topher Grace was announced as a villain claiming we were going to see him slip into a certain alien symbiotic costume. Even we here at AICN ran a rumor about this, but I'm really skeptical about this one.
Does anybody look at Topher Grace and see Venom? I know I sure don't. Sure, it could be possible that Sam Raimi would approach the character differently from the books, make him more of a mirror of Spider-Man, a kind of Bizarro Spider-Man. That would be true if Raimi hadn't done dozens of interviews stating that he doesn't like the character of Venom, preferring the old cache of villains. Could this have been a multi-year in the making slight of hand trick? I suppose so, but it just doesn't feel right.
I think there may be a possibility of Spidey appearing in the Black Suit in the film... and that could possibly be the source of all these Venom rumors, but even that I'm dubious of. I only give it any credit because there have been so many reports of Venom and various other "black material" being sighted around Sony's wardrobe department.
The more recent rumors come from Rich Johnson, who looked into the DV-H.com rumors of the Chameleon and found something that would be a big spoiler if it pans out. I'm betting it won't pan out and I'll tell you why.
The rumor says that BOTH Thomas Hayden Church and Topher Grace will be playing The Chameleon. The twist is that the shapeshifter has been this character warming up to Mary Jane on the sly as the affable Topher Grace. On the surface this sounds not only good, but pretty damn cool. However, wouldn't that make The Chameleon the main villain for Spider-Man 3? Isn't that a kind of weak follow-up to Doc Ock? And isn't The Chameleon a bad choice considering X-MEN's Mystique has been on screens doing the shapeshifting thing for almost 5 years now?
What doesn't make sense to me is that according to Rich Johnson's rumor this is supposed to be a big secret, yet when the casting of Grace was announced it was known he was going to play a villain. If this was supposed to be a big twist in the movie, why would they announce Topher Grace as a villain? Even Avi Arad confirmed his villain status at Comic-Con this year... when asked who the villains were going to be in Spidey 3 Arad answered, "Thomas Hayden Church and Topher Grace" to many "Awwwww"s from the audience. Doesn't make any sense to me.
This also doesn't jive with what I've been hearing from many people close to the production. From the most trusted sources I'm hearing that the villains will be Sandman and Electro. Sandman I'm pretty sure of. I trust in the source who said the second villain was Electro, too, although I've had many different sources who tell me Sandman is in and not so many on Electro.
It's also quite possible we'll be seeing an appearance from Green Goblin 2, but I'd doubt he'd pop up in a big way if there's already 2 confirmed villains, even with these rumors of a changed up Gobby costume and "surf-board-like glider" are to be believed. I'd hope Raimi would slowly build Harry as a character so we really enjoy seeing him on that glider in the 4th film. And for God's sakes change his mask!
Who knows where we'll fall? I bet Raimi and Arad are having a great time laughing at all the rumors flying about. Anybody who has listened to the commentaries on one of the 135,209 different editions of any of the EVIL DEAD movies knows that Raimi can be a bit of a sadist. Instead of him whipping the shit out of Bruce Campbell, he's watching the fan community squirm.
Am I right about the villains? Or am I dead wrong? Could Sony be going forward with Chameleon as the main villain? I honestly don't know for sure and I won't know until they make the official announcement. I like Sandman a lot and the recent appearance of Church on Jay Leno where he revealed he's bulking up for his role makes me think more and more of him wearing that tight black-striped green shirt. Not in a funny way, just sayin'...
Ultimately, we won't know jack until that pre-filming press conference at the end of the year where they plan on announcing the villains. If I hear anything solid in the mean time I'll be sure to pass it along to you good folks. All I know is there's something fishy about a lot of these rumors. What do you guys think of all this? Let me know in the talkbacks below.
http://www.aintitcoo...ay.cgi?id=21036
#70
Posted 20 August 2005 - 17:13
Attached Files
Chris Claremont, Scott Lobdell, Fabian Nicieza, Grant Morrison och Joss Whedon skriver X-Men BÄST!
"I caught a glimpse now it haunts me"
#71
Posted 26 August 2005 - 14:30
Kanske blir lite mycket goblins ifall Harry blir goblin i denna också eller i en senare film. Gillar goblins, men inte i överflöd.
#72
Posted 26 August 2005 - 14:55
We received the following email just recently:
Don't reveal your source, but a source close to the production of Spider-Man 3 confirmed for me that the main villain played by Mr. Thomas Hayden Church will in fact be the Chameleon.
Church plays Dmitri Smerdyakov, who goes by false name Dr. Turner at Peter's college. The Chameleon also has a brother in this film, which will set up Kraven the Hunter for a future sequel I'm told. Le'ts just say that the Chameleon will use his powers of performance and identify theft to bridge a gap between MJ and Peter Parker in this film.
The producers and Raimi have a big publicity event right before production starts to make this announcement. Look for it after Thanksgiving, with production to start this winter. This will begin the hype for Spider-Man again. They will also start issuing a new animated DVD featuring the Chameleon right before the new movie hits theatres.
Also, Harry does become the Second Green Goblin, but only at the very end. He's kind of like Anakin in Episode III -- growing evil throughout the film, and not donning the full mantle of recognizable villain until the climax.
Please announce this.
It's official: the Chameleon is the character Hayden Church will play, I promise. Just don't reveal your source, because with my name out there, it could be traced to the source on set. That's all I ask, thanks.
Vad säger man? Kan bli bra, hade dock hoppats på Sandman. Nu är det iofs inte helt säkert att detta stämmer, men det är en möjlighet. Vad tycker ni?
#73
Posted 26 August 2005 - 17:23
#74
Posted 26 August 2005 - 17:34
Chris Claremont, Scott Lobdell, Fabian Nicieza, Grant Morrison och Joss Whedon skriver X-Men BÄST!
"I caught a glimpse now it haunts me"
#75
Posted 26 August 2005 - 18:44
Det där har senare mer eller mindre avfärdats i Aint it cool news, som jag postade ett citat från.
ok, tur det. Chamelon kan säkert erbjuda förviring, men inte mycket till action. En klen uppföljare till octopus. med Sandman däremot kan man med lite fantasi skapa en mängd banbrytande actionscener




